translated by google造句

• The work has begun . [ translate by google]
• It makes sense if you translate it back to English, as if it was translated by Google Translate.
• See, for example, the lead section from the Polish article ( as translated by Google Translate ):
• To see what I found try the following link : Interesting report translated by Google . " No big deal ", you say, " I knew that Google could do that ".
• :The first word means either " failure / defeat " or " fear ", the second word is translated by Google Translate ( probably incorrectly ) as " incognizant ", and the remaining symbols spell " Bodhidharma " with suffix'- du'(!
• :( Translated by Google-still difficult to interpret ) " hello could you tell me I have Receipts renseignier a meail on my shelf since then I do not know m use it strikes me that following a meail re鐄mon pocesseur ?is aretter unexpectedly I do not know how I am with you seriously ill Pourrier help me to put my prosesseur enroute thank you"
• When we say does not meet notability guidelines, nobody is insulting the subject or saying they are not a worthy person, not a valued member of a community, not well-liked etc . ( At the same time, having an article in Wikipedia doesn't make one valuable or of high esteem either : the most reprehensible people who have ever lived probably have good sized articles . ) The guidelines are in place and are firm for a reason to help Wikipedia stay credible; we can barely keep up as it is with the floor of articles being created that are pure spam, incomprehensible content translated by Google, probable fifth-grade homework assignments, advertisements disguised as articles, etc . We use these guidelines of notability not just for people, but for every article, whether it's about asteroids, math equations, cat food companies, a church in Ghana, counterinsurgency in the Ottoman Empire in 1915, cargo plane crashes, French idioms, ethnic groups that nobody but the article creator has ever heard of, and of course, dogs that were elected mayor . . . . . . . . every single of those were the topic of an article I voted to either keep or delete this weekend.